A
little over a month ago, key player Procter & Gamble announced their new
plan to cut costs and reach $10 billion in savings by 2016. The plan calls for
a major overhaul and restructuring of many of the company’s various
departments. To shave $10 billion off of their bottom line P&G CEO Bob
McDonald laid out the multi-faceted plan, affecting many areas of the balance
sheet, in late February 2012.
The first order of the plan calls
for approximately 5,700 jobs to be cut from its nonmanufacturing work force by
June 2013. These cuts will initially lead to savings of $800 million by 2014,
rising to savings of $1 billion by 2016. The company plans to make adjustments
to their marketing budget to save another $1 billion. To save $6 billion in
their expenditures, P&G also plans on using less expensive materials for
packaging, developing a more efficient supply chain, and altering products to
be more concentrated. To achieve this multistep plan of $10 billion in savings
will eventually cost the company close to $3.5 billion in restructuring costs.
In addition to the cuts within more
their more stable markets, P&G is setting its sights on expansion in
emerging markets in Africa, Asia, and South America. Expansion into these new
markets includes opening 20 new manufacturing plants by 2015. Overall, the main
goal of expansion is to increase revenues and add to their bottom line, while
simultaneous cutting costs to create a larger profit margin.
Investors and analysts welcomed
these extensive cuts to P&G’s budget. Many investors had been deterred by
P&G’s inability to operate at more efficient costs, especially when sales
growth in well-established markets, like the United States and Europe, has not
been as strong as it once was. Upon announcement of the plan, stock rose 3%.
P&G’s budget cuts and new
market expansion represents the company’s repositioning within the industry’s
market, affecting its competitors. As P&G attempts to increase its market
share by earning more, it inevitably takes away from fellow companies in the
industry. This strategy also demonstrates what’s expected of a company from
investors. Investors are looking for efficiency and future expansion. P&G
is catering to what investors expect through the implementation of their
four-year plan.
Normally I would raise red flags at a company cutting back costs because I normally associate cost cutting with poor financial management. But the fact that stockholders are responding positively is interesting. It does make sense, considering it means that P&G is taking preventative action with their company.
ReplyDeleteI found this plan of Procter & Gamble interesting. I think that it is a good strategy to maintain its position and to strengthen it even more. This company have been so successful because they have know how to act in all aspects.
ReplyDelete